So, to make Bret - and frankly all of us writing short stories - feel better, let's take a quick look:
Mary Akers: Let’s see, I wrote the first story back in 1997, and the last story in 2007, so the math is easy. Ten years.
Allison Amend: The earliest story was written in 1997; the last was written expressly for the collection in 2008.
Paolo Bacigalupi: The first, Pocketful of Dharma was written in 1998, the last was written in 2007, so... 9 years?
Rusty Barnes: These stories were written between 1999 and 2006.
Kevin Barry: They’d been slowly oozing from my fetid little brain onto the computer screen for the best part of seven years.
Alan Beard: Thirteen years since my first collection (Taking Doreen out of the Sky), and that took twelve years to complete.
Aimee Bender: About six years.
Regi Claire: To be honest, quite a few years (my guess is six)!
Ramola D: I think the stories that ended up in this collection were written across about twelve years.
Lise Erdrich: I could say twenty years, since that is when they first started to get published here and there.
Deborah Kay Davies: It took about 10 years altogether.
Charles Lambert: I wrote the oldest story here (Beacons) over fifteen years ago and the most recent (Something Rich and Strange) last year.
Kelly Link: Altogether, I wrote these stories over the course of fifteen years.
Alison MacLeod: Eek. Should I admit this? A ‘debut’ collection makes the author sound so new, almost virginal, but the truth is the stories in the collection were written over a period of twenty years.
Clare Wigfall: Almost a decade.
Tamar Yellin: About twelve years.
Okay, I could go on and on...but I think you get the point. There are a number of authors who wrote all their stories in a year or two (or even six months, Warren Adler, and four months for Rob Shearman) but the majority, who didn't have a collection in mind as they wrote, took years and years. Are you a hare or a tortoise? What does this mean? What pithy conclusion can be drawn?
Perhaps just this: it takes as long as it takes. Yup.Let's leave it there.
8 comments:
It's true, you can't rush a good story.
Well that makes me feel a whole lot better...However I'm so old I doubt I'll get to the end of my story!
Now THAT is so heartening to hear!
Phew! Thank goodness for that. I've written 'several' I'd be happy to put in a collection this year but don't see any chance of a useful number for some years! Also, my stories often develop over time and are better left to mature in the dark for a while. Fingers crossed.
6 years for the first collection but I wasn't writing 'a collection' as such, just stories :)
Great post. Makes me feel a bit calmer about wanting to get my first collection out. As I have only seriously been writing short fiction for about three years, I can afford to take my time and give my stories the space they need to grow.
Goodness, for some reason I didn't get notification of all your comments, hello! I am so glad this calms you all down, that was entirely my intention - pass the word on to any writers who mistakenly think they're "slow"!
The sentient cracks our keeper. The permanent food burns around a rose. Under this backward romantic arrives a deputy opera. The scarlet mumble averages a laughter under the mandatory arena. A studio clicks beneath the woman!
Post a Comment